Tuesday, October 28, 2008


My Dear Friends:

As you may have noticed, I have stayed completely away from my political write-ups and dissertations about Barack Obama and his presidential campaign, for which I am certain many of you are grateful. Throughout my silence, I continued receiving hundreds of e-mails from my die-hard conservative friends. I couldn’t help but to realize that most all of them, if not all, had just about one thing in common: each and every e-mail seemed to repeat itself with an emotional message of awareness in the potential dangers that lie ahead, should this man Barack Obama become the next President of the United States – a highly probable event if judged by the latest polls.

In the e-mails, I have read just about everything about this man and his character - from his overt Marxist agenda to his dubious associations and lies, and everything in between, I have read it all, and so have you probably. I became a part of it all, as I, like the rest of you, could not resist the urge to share with the rest of world the ”warning messages” on the impending threats that this man poses to the United States and to the world.
Our e-mails were, regretfully, circumscribed to just but a few in our mailing lists but the urge was such, that spreading the word amongst even that few was equally accommodating for the exorcism. Our intent, regardless of the size of our audience, was noble and a sacred obligation for those of us who still behold democracy and capitalism as the only way of life. I praise those of you that have still not given up. I did, thus the silence. Before you pass judgment, however, or burn me at the stake for my withdrawal witchcraft, just listen me out, as I have to assume that, in the end, I may just persuade you to sanctify me, once you hear what I have to say.

As my first act of constriction, I ask you: Would it not be reasonable to assume that after one year of intense educational propaganda the nation and the American people would be completely and totally aware of who is Barack Obama? Over and over again, some more, some less, the entire nation has, by now, been exposed to the man, to his obscure relationships with the Jeremiah Wrights, the Bill Ayers, the Reskos, A.C.O.R.N.; to his wife’s professed unwillingness in feeling proud of America; to his willingness for unconditional meetings with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the Castro brothers; to his Muslim upbringing and his admitted Marxist preferences in his college years; to his unwillingness to fund and support our troops in Iraq; to whom he really is and what he really stands for. Yet, let’s face it. The man is still ahead in the polls, and were the elections held today, he’d be almost assured to be elected the next President of the United States. Ask yourself the question: Why? Why do a majority of the American people seemingly want to overlook and neglect the threats?

My dear friends lets not kid each other anymore. Let’s deal with reality as sad as this may be. Americans know exactly who Barack Obama is and a majority of Americans want Barack Obama to be their next President. As simple as that. To most of us, conservative pundits, our commitment to principle would have us searching for answers that would make some sense of what seems incomprehensible.

In our search for answers, some of us will choose to never trust the polls, some may fall prey to the whimsical woes of the Bush administration and the recent economic debacle, some to our foreign oil dependency and raising gas prices, and some to race. Beyond whatever personal satisfaction and justification we may find for a seemingly irrational desire to elect this man as President, therein lies a greater truth – a truth much greater than the issues; a truth much greater than a man and his associations; a truth much greater than all our e-mails and messages; a disguised truth that disposes our messages our e-mails and the political issues as inconsequential aberrations; a truth where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. The real truth, dear friends is that the United States of America is about to become a Communist nation. Yes, you heard me right: a communist nation.

The real truth, dear friends, is that a great majority of Americans want communism, even though, their wishes may border the sublime. Case it has not yet become self-evident, Americans are on the verge of electing the first communist to the Presidency of this country. Thought it would never happen, not in the U.S. didn’t you? So did I and so did many millions who never thought to live and see the day when a man like Barack Obama would run for the highest office in the world, let alone win the election. Yet, the fact remains, however, that it is happening and it is real.

Case you doubt me, just take a look around you, Obama is not alone. Don’t let yourself be fooled with such a romantic thought of poetic individualism. The United States is plagued with communists. Hear me well, I said communists, not liberals, communists. It is everywhere we turn. It is in the media. It is Hollywood. It is in the nation’s most prestigious schools of higher education. It is in the youth of the nation. It is in a presumed Civil Right movement for equality of the races. It is in the government and in the courts of the country. It is in the failed and the envious. It is well organized, powerful and long-time in the makings. With each new day, communism rears its ugly head just about everywhere we look around.

For years now, they, the communists have managed to masquerade and camouflage a covert agenda with a disguising lexicon that took a life of its own – a lexicon where the words “liberal”, and “to the left” have been swiftly introduced to the American public as their preferred spinning substitutes for communism. I say to them, enough is enough. I am utterly repulsed with the pontification of these terms and their cover-up. I am sick and tired on the way “Marxism” is stealthily introduced into the glossary of deceitfulness. I refuse to give into the spin and the disguise anymore. I refuse to continue standing by and not calling a spade a spade. I refuse to continue letting white guilt-ridden Americans, continue paying the current price for a history of racism - a price that today allows Black born Americans to disenfranchise themselves from their homeland and brand themselves as part of another nation. The “African-American” label is fully burdened with hate and a quiet reluctance of heritage. Simply put, a subversive hate of Whites in the U.S., as professed by Obama’s own mentor Jeremiah Wright. All the while, as we the country and White America praise the latter’s favorite son: Barack Obama.

Communism, we all know it, thrives on racism and class warfare. Ironically, it took a commoner in the person of “Joe the Plumber”, for Barack Obama to publicly admit to his “redistribution of wealth” platform agenda. Again, the latest edition to the deception glossary. It is, without a doubt, communism at its best. As I listen to Obama’s rhetorical campaign speeches, I can help but think on how this twenty first century communist has been able to accommodate the times, while he swiftly substitutes, Karl Marx’s proletariat and bourgeoisie for “Middle Class Blue Collar America” and “The Oil Companies”.

Let’s face it friends, the United States of America, is without a doubt, on the verge of becoming a communist nation. At the expense of being demonized by my opponents as a delusional extremist, I’ve even thought of the possibility of a great conspiracy behind the man Barack Obama. My fear, as far out radical as it may appear, it’s not, mind you, without merits, worthy, at worst, of plausible consideration. Think of our world today. Think of the world’s overt hatred for the United States, capitalism and all it stands for. Think of 9-11. Think of radical Muslims and terrorism. We live in a chaotic world environment of hatefulness where the United States and its allies have been the targets for destruction as even children are converted into human bombs in the pursue of their evil objective.

A man like Barack Obama with a professed conviction for military weakness would indeed be the ideal candidate for U.S. haters throughout the world – would it not? In my presumptuous conspiracy theory, I think of a man that a mere three years back, had no political history, barring an effort to…yes, you guess it, socialize his own State of Illinois, and able to shatter the political aspirations of a highly polished politician such as was Hillary Clinton. I think of a man that has set new records of campaign funding of untraceable money. I think of a Messianic rise from the tombs of the unknown to a highly coveted candidacy for the highest office in the nation and in the world. I think of a nation that discards and refuses to acknowledge the demons of communism written all over this man’s politics. I have even thought, might not the recent economic debacle, have been a well crafted and timely event planned by the conspiracy? One has to wonder. One really has to wonder if the Barack Obama phenomenon should not yet be attributed but to a greater power – a greater force escaping the minds of the populous, as otherwise, one can only assume the nation’s continued denial of Obama’s evilness as a practical impossibility.

Many will argue, the mere thought of a Communist United States, could never see the light in, of all nations, this nation. The arguments will range from the limited power of the Executive branch to the oversight and balance of power by the other government branches. I say to them, just look at Congress today. Take a hard and close look at Congress today and tell me what you think. Take Nancy Pelosi and tell me what you think. Think of Barack Obama as your next President with a communist Congress and tell me if you still think it cannot happen in the U.S.

Karl Marx once said: “of all societies in the world, communism would best be suited for a country with a developed economy, and that country is the U.S.” Bill Ayers and many others like him have taken these Marxist postulates and embraced them as ideals worth destroying this country and all it stands for. Doing so unrepentantly. Barack Obama comes to us as the “chosen one” in making this dream a reality. Class warfare has already begun in our nation. To the less fortunate, communism and redistribution of wealth stands tall as an expectation for change and a better life. Their support of the conspiracy is built on the naivety of their hopes. Sometimes on the resentment of their individual failures in a society and a system where Darwin’s infamous “survival of the fittest” philosophy, truly determines their share of the commonwealth. To the more educated, even the rich, the conspiracy comes in the form of “textbook socialism” – in the form of a perverse and misguided philanthropy of utopist provenance, characterized by “giving to others” provided it doesn’t infringe on their own wealth and life-styles. For that matter, I have yet to see the first member of this clan packing up and leaving the motherland seeking refuge in their coveted communist countries throughout the world.

These, my dear friends are the reasons for my silence. Yes, I have given up in spreading the word and the messages anymore than what I have in the past few months. The time has come when I am really hoping for Obama’s America to have a taste of their own medicine. Let them live under communism. I truly believe Barack Obama will win this election. My last hopes for the contrary went out the window as I watched my candidate John McCain in a public rally debating with an outspoken surrogate in the audience about Obama’s righteousness and being a good American citizen. McCain’s campaign of integrity and dignity are a reflection of the man himself – yet one which may very well in the end deliver this country to the communists in a silver platter. If it happens, I shall forever resent this man, regardless of his honorability.

In my heart of hearts, I truly believe Barack Obama will win this election. I truly believe Barack Obama will be the next President of the United States of America. I see Barack Obama’s election as the final realization of a long-planned conspiracy, the likes of which the world has never seen before. Worst yet, I cannot disenfranchise this man from the prophets and their prophecies, from Nostradamus to Mathew’s biblical prediction of the end: "And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.” Matthew 24:14. As irrational and outlandish as it may sound, Obama’s Messianic aura serves only to reassert my unwillingness to disavow him as the a possible Anti-Christ and Armageddon, all in one. Ready, willing and able to fulfill the prophecies. As I hear the drums of war beating to the threats of nuclear destruction with a Barack Obama as President of the United States, I hasten to say, I see not a “new beginning” but the “beginning of the end.” May God save the United States of America: “…one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all”.

Monday, September 29, 2008


My Dear Friends:

During the past few weeks, I, like millions of Americans, have been, hastily watching the unfolding of one of the worst financial debacles in the US’s financial and economic history. Some of the experts have called it: “the worst since the 1929 Great Depression”. I say potentially much worst. The collapse and downfall of mortgage giants Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and other industry moguls, are ghastly enough to have everyone in America fretful on what lies in the days ahead. The elite groups of failed giants rank among our nation’s leading financial service institutions - accountable for trillions of dollars of overstated assets. Assumingly, assets backing most of the nation’s mortgages, securities, derivates, savings accounts, retirement accounts, and virtually every other instrument said to guarantee the foundation of our nation’s economic system. The impact of their demise, could indeed pose a potential financial disaster of cataclysmic proportions for every American – now and in years to come.

As to what led us into this catastrophe, I personally do not think there are any easy answers. There were, as far as I am concerned, many variables that contributed to this downfall. If you twisted my arm, however, for a one word or sentence as a response, I would lay the blame mostly on “government deregulation”, greed, financial irresponsibility, and lack of accountability with both Republicans and Democrats, equally sharing a portion of the blame.

Assuming I am right on my presumptuous conclusion of the causes, I propose to you then, that the $700 billion dollar “bailout” now being introduced by the US Congress, should, in fact, be rendered unacceptable to taxpayers in America. By virtue alone of the fact that the economic future of every American is at stake here, each and every taxpayer, all 139 million of us should really give utmost consideration to this “bailout” proposal and the ensuing consequences as a result of the same. After all, in it, we may find either “a true new beginning or the true beginning of the end”. As far as I am concerned, you would have expected the 2001 Enron demise, to have been, at best the ending, and at worst a deterrent to financial disasters of this magnitude. Instead, seven short years and a few trillion dollars after the fact, we find ourselves another disaster, if yet of greater proportions. Truly worrisome.

The most troubling issue I have with the “bailout” proposal is the fact it is being proposed mostly by the same culprits of the debacle - the same fraternity of corrupted statesmen, political “greed-heads”, and failed financial wizards. By the same political clan, who have, for the past eight years been taking in money from Freddie and Fannie - two of the largest donors of campaign funding and “soft-money” contributions to the proponents and their political parties. On this issue and this issue alone, for starters, I contend the righteousness of the $700 billion dollar number. I have to, no doubt, assume certain correlation to the value of highly over-sated assets in the cooked balance sheets of the failed. As such, my trepidation grows. As well it should. Nonetheless, even if I we were to give the culprits a non-deserved benefit of the doubt vote of confidence on the $700 billion magic number, even then, I contend to question the merits and the foundations for a proposal, hastily prepared in a matter of hours only to accommodate the bells of Wall Street.

At the outset, I would argue the $700 billon dollars should never be given in such a manner where government purchases the over-inflated assets, considering the real value of the latter is now virtually unascertainable. The proposed bailout would vest government with the power and authority to conduct business on our behalf. If government has, admittedly, accepted their failed ability to administrate our affairs, imagine the evils that could come with yet their involvement in an area historically saved by capitalism for the private sector alone. Giving government such power, I say, could indeed be potentially catastrophic.

A bailout, such as the one now being proposed will, more likely than not, trickle down into the economic chain to expose ourselves to more of the same. As I stand here before you with a firm conviction for my opposing the tenants of the proposal now offered, I humbly tender an alternative solution –one which, notwithstanding the inherent lack of expertise on which it is conceived, it nevertheless intends to mitigate the arguments, so as to challenge the merits of the solution to the nation’s greatest crisis ever.

To begin with, in my reviewed bailout model, I would let capitalism and free-enterprise, do what capitalism and free enterprise do best, that is: make us money. As an alternative bailout, I would offer the $700 billion dollars in the form of a short-term loan, with a 5 to 10 years payback timeline at a 2% low interest. I would earmark funding for the private sector’s financial services of America, with a priority agenda aimed at the mortgage market and the foreclosed assets.

I would, at the same time, set the minimum reserve rate at 20%, to create the “multiplier effect”. Case you may not be familiar with this basic economic principle: “The multiplier effect depends on the set reserve requirement. So, to calculate the impact of the multiplier effect on the money supply, we start with the amount banks initially take in
through deposits and divide this by the reserve ratio. If, for example, the reserve requirement is 20%, for every $100 a customer deposits into a bank, $20 must be kept in reserve. However, the remaining $80 can be loaned out to other bank customers. This $80 is then deposited by these customers into another bank, which in turn must also keep 20%, or $16, in reserve but can lend out the remaining $64. This cycle continues - as more people deposit money and more banks continue lending it - until finally the $100 initially deposited creates a total of $500 ($100 / 0.2) in deposits. This creation of deposits is the “multiplier effect”. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/multipliereffect.asp
On a $700 billion dollar loan, the multiplier effect would generate $3.5 trillion dollars of additional taxable deposits as well as interest revenues of approximately $72 billion dollars. The depleted assets now held by all the failed giants would enter into a “free-market” system sold to the highest bidders in the private sector, amongst investors not the government, thus providing for profit incentives both to the financial services community and banking industry of the private sector - a feasible and accessible objective by the newly-created funding sources.
Considering the root-core on the causes of the debacle, I would implement the $700 billion dollar bailout loan with the strictest contingencies, aimed exclusively at protecting taxpayers from the reoccurrence of a similar catastrophe. To begin with, I would subject the bailout to the revocation of Clinton’s Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 and the reinstitution of Teddy Roosevelt’s New Deal Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. I would immediately charter two new government agencies specifically as oversight and regulatory instruments of the government. The agencies would keep lower tear employees of Freddie and Fannie, to preserve employment of the greater portion of loyal and dedicated employees that fell victim to their corrupted administrations. Considering the magnitude of the debacle, and potentially ensuing catastrophic consequences, I would have these two agencies operating under our Homeland Security Program, acting independently of the FED, the Secretary of the Treasury and otherwise conventional financial regulators.
Furthermore, the agencies would function with checks and balances power, much in the image of our Congress; looking over each other to: regulate, monitor and oversee all of the nation’s financial and banking service activities, with a priority focusing on reviewed criteria aimed at ensuring a healthy repayment of all debt-service incurred by the borrowing community of the nation. I would immediately introduce laws in Congress designed specifically to insulate and prohibit any government institutions and political participants associated to the financial services industry of the US, from either issuing and /or receiving and /or engaging in any lobbying expenditures, campaign and /or “soft-money” contributions, such that same may induce corruption to the system.
I would introduce laws that would disable, forever again, executive administrators being able to receive compensation packages incommensurate to the financial strength of their institutions, more so when the latter’s pose a risk to the nation’s economic stability. I would charge the newly created government regulatory agencies with the implementation of revised accounting criteria and accounting practices exclusively formulated to monitor an actuary value of all assets and the development of specific criteria and rules relative to unnecessary expenditures. I would also introduce laws that would limit governmental participation of private-interest groups such as A.C.O.R.N., and others similar, from political influence to the newly created regulatory agencies.
Finally, I would subject my bailout to a complete government re-organization in the finances and economic sectors of the administration. Such a reorganization would include the firing or termination of the Chairman of the SEC, Christopher Cox, the Secretary of the Treasury, Henry M. Paulson and FED Chairman, Ben Bernake. Their laxity and inability to prevent this catastrophe, render them, as far as I am concerned, ineligible for the posts they now hold.
In summary, my dear friends, as far as I am concerned, at the root of all our evils, once again, is the pervasive hand of engineered socialism at its best. As I offer my bailout alternative, I can almost hear my liberal critics chastise me and chant to the Obama tunes, as to the impending neglect of my proposal to all the poor and the underprivileged. To them I say, for the past ten years both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, have been catering well prepared mortgage-backed packages crafted for marginal borrowers, with little or no regard for their ability to repay –all bannered under presumed social equality tenants. The end result, thus, was inevitable as both lenders and borrowers entered the orgy with a complete awareness of these results. It is about time we all understand that capitalism and socialism simply cannot coexist to where their preclusion is as obvious as the persisting crisis we now face of unprecedented proportions.
Your social tenants, my liberal friends, mind you, could and should still be accommodated somehow in any bailout within our capitalist economic system. The accommodation, however, should come in the form of yet less treacherous consequences. Housing issues for the poor and the underprivileged are more a matter of grants and charity than they should be as foundations for a sound economy as was the case in our present debacle. A.C.O.R.N. and the rest of your left-wing liberal organizations should concentrate their efforts on community service programs and leave our free-enterprise capitalist system alone once and for all.
In closing, I offer you my humble apology for what may indeed be construed to be an overly-simplistic and flawed economic bailout alternative. Grant you, I do not propose to be an economist or a financial expert. I offer my thoughts exclusively as a concerned taxpayer. The thoughts and issues proposed may, for all I know, lack the know-how and expertise more akin to my esteemed friends in the financing and banking communities. To them and to all of you, I say, I may very well be wide off the mark as to our common objective in resolving the rather vast financial problems facing our nation. You are invited to challenge the tenants of my proposal. If you do, however, I would expect you to offer your challenges in a manner such that you may proof me wrong and educate me on the issues.
Your challenges will only serve to enhance my appreciation for yet a better alternative, in which case we would only be a step closer to meeting our objective of resolving this crisis. To that effect, I bid my proposal today to be, on its own merits or lack thereof, merely offered as: “food for thought”. God bless us all.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008


During the past few days, I, like millions of Americans, have just been enjoying and delighted with the nomination of Sarah Palin, as the Vice-Presidential candidate on the Republican ticket. To me, personally, her nomination just served to assert my own personal beliefs on what I have been preaching for the past 20 years, namely: “that women in America are, regretfully, the greatest untapped resource of the U.S,”– more so probably than even oil. Matter of fact, had we had a woman in the Presidency or Vice-Presidency of this country earlier in our history, we probably wouldn’t be in the oil dependency mode we find ourselves today – mind you, one of America’s greatest threats.

How I came to being an unswerving “feminist” supporter is really not important. Needless to say, for someone like me, who’s been promoting women equality all his life, the nomination of Sarah Palin, was, as far as I am concerned, one of the greatest breakthroughs in American history. Notwithstanding her predecessors, Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, comes with a refreshing aura of the complete package. While Gerry and Hillary were both able to transcend the gender barrier, neither one embodied the “persona” America was really looking forward to have as our first woman President or Vice-President.

Palin, a virtual unknown, rocketed into political stardom within hours of her nomination – a credit, I may add, to John McCain. Regardless, and in spite of McCain’s potentially ulterior motives for choosing her as his running mate, the fact remains that Palin’s record as a politician and as woman are worthy of inspiration to all American women -liberals and conservatives alike. Palin’s resume has it all. As we now know, within her political domain in the great state of Alaska, Palin has shaken the establishment, fought political corruption among her own party, faced up to the oil moguls, managed the budget, and…yes, all the while, a loving wife and mother of five. Come to think of it, for all we know, this rather “unknown” may very well indeed have changed the outcome of this election and by default the course of this nation and the world.

As would be expected from any politician running for office, the opposing party’s pundits did not waste any time searching for her “dirty laundry” list; hoping, somehow, they would undermine the new candidate’s overwhelming admiration and support. Fear stroke the liberal hearts of America, as most were still riding the crest of the wave left from the Democratic National Convention. No sooner had the Greek columns of Britney Spears’ choreographer been removed from the stage that had plummeted Barack Obama into his ever-favorite stardom role, no sooner had the wave vanished from underneath as Sarah Palin’s acceptance speech hit the airwaves throughout the nation.

As we all later found out, the “dirty laundry” list was all but preposterously weak; a pregnant teenage daughter; a husband arrested for a DUI; and a presumptive lack of experience relative to politics in America’s small towns. Regretfully for liberal democrats and their beloved media pundits, the attacks were quickly disregarded as personal and reckless, many of which, ironically, just served only to enhance the public’s view of the new candidate, and boosted the polls of the McCain / Palin ticket to show for it.

Throughout it all, I carefully made mental notes of some of Palin’s critics while one in particular, really caught my attention. To wit, none other than Jurassic Park’s Gloria Steinmen. It would have been quite reasonable to assume and expect that for America’s must renowned feminist political activist, the news of Sarah Palin’s nomination and resume would have, indeed, been the ultimate realization of a lifetime objective. Instead, following McCain's selection of Sarah Palin as his running mate, Steinem penned an op-ed in which she labeled Palin an "unqualified woman" who "opposes everything most other women want and need." Steinem described Palin’s nomination speech as "divisive and deceptive".

Liberal feminism as forever promoted by Steinmen, also known as "mainstream feminism," asserts the equality of men and women through political and legal reform. It is an individualistic form of feminism and theory, which focuses on women’s ability to show and maintain their equality through their own actions and choices. You would have thought Palin to be the ideal poster- character for Gloria’s movement, wouldn’t you? What then, did Steinmen really mean when she said that: Palin opposes everything most other women want and need?

What then, does “liberal feminism” really stands for? Liberal feminism as promoted by Steinmen was born in the 1960’s – a turbulent time in American history. Sparked by righteous ideals and masterfully disguised under the banner of equality of men and women, liberal feminism quickly gained the support of young women in America, who, at the time, were rebelling against the establishment as the “in” thing to do. The establishment then, as now, included America’s most conservative and traditional values such as marriage, children and family. Steinmen’s radical liberal feminism of the 1960’s, was subversively conceived and crafted for women to undermine every fabric of this society as a means of liberation from male supremacy. To that end, marriage, children and family were truly incompatible with Steinmen’s objectives and, as such, had to be disposed of.

In essence, Steinmen’s liberal feminist agenda, would in the end, merely serve as an exchange of gender dominance as opposed to the purported equality of the sexes set forth in her messianic role as savior of women in America. By virtue alone of God’s-given natural laws, the procreation of mankind would only be attainable through the association of man and woman, notwithstanding the name chosen for this association, thus Gloria’s model was destined for failure even before it started.

Steinmen’s liberal feminist model in the new millennium is simply a Jurassic concept, outdated and obsolete. I have to believe that Gloria and whatever is left of her now defunct movement, by today’s standards, thrives exclusively on hate towards men with some obscure Freudian dysfunctionality as the driving force behind it. Regretfully though, the “liberal” banner used by Steinmen for the last forty years has now tainted the true “feminists” of America, as represented in the persona of Sarah Palin. It is no wonder then, that Steinmen would be one of Palin’s worst critics.

Steinmen’s criticisms of Palin are truly the latter’s greatest accolade. At age 74, Steinmen’s time has passed. Liberal feminism, as conceived by Steinmen, belongs now in the history books, in the chapters following Woodstock and the protest for the war in Vietnam. Over the past forty years, Steinmen’s distorted feminism managed to disenfranchise a great constituency of true “feminist”, supported by husbands, sons and daughters and yes, by most men in America, conservatives and liberals alike.

As Steinmen’s failed ideals disappear into oblivion, America shall be forever grateful for whatever contributions she may have made to women in America along the way. The women who truly believed in the kind of feminism embodied in Sarah Palin. But, for God’s sake, give it up already Gloria. Can you understand, that, contrary to what you may wished for, Sarah Palin is indeed what women in America want and need? You claimed Sarah is "divisive and deceptive". I can’t help but think of the old cliché: “it takes one to know one”.

In summary, to all women in America, I say to you: congratulations. I truly believe your time has come. Sarah Palin may not come in the messianic role embodied by Gloria Steinmen over the past forty years. Instead, she comes as one of you or better yet, as one of us. Equality has finally come of age. Candidate Barack Obama, had his chance to do a similar deed for women in America, yet he passed on it. Too bad, isn’t it? Shame on him. McCain, didn’t pass on it. Who will you vote for? That’s your choice. Meantime, I say to Gloria, regardless of wins this election, for God’s sake please, go back to the Park and rest. America has had enough of you.

Sunday, June 15, 2008


My Fellow Americans:

During the past few months, throughout the primary campaign for the Presidency of the country, there have been issues raised that attempt against my character and my judgment. I have been repeatedly accused for my non-confrontational stance and for not tackling these issues head-on. The time has come, when I owe everyone in America an explanation of each and every issue raised.

I shall start with the Jeremiah Wright issue. It is imperative that you understand my association and involvement with my Pastor and mentor Jeremiah Wright. Indeed, I have been listening to Pastor’s Wright’s vitriolic and vile diatribe for twenty years. I would like to explain why I have listened to him and why I have been an active participant of the Trinity United Church in Chicago.

First, let me remind you of my religious background. Both my father and my stepfather were born and raised Muslims. My Indonesian stepfather took me to Jakarta, and enrolled me in a Wahabi school. As you all know, Wahabism is the radical teaching that is followed by Muslim terrorists who are now waging Jihad against the U.S. and the western world. It is only reasonable to assume that my Wahabistic background, coupled with my tribal roots passed on by my father’s Lou Tribesmen lineal heritage, would induce me to search for a religious identity that would preserve my early teachings. That’s exactly what I found in Pastor Wright and the Trinity Unite Church. As you have seen in T.V., the Church acts as a tribe, and Pastor Wright’s black liberation theology wages divisiveness between Blacks against Whites and the U.S. government just like Wahabi. So, there you go. I trust this will put an end to this issue.
As far as my association with William Ayers, America please, I wish you would all give up on your cynical criticisms of my association with him. Bill and I go back a few years. Mind you, not as long as when he was an active member of the Weather Underground Organization and carried on with all those terrorist attacks on government buildings or when he and his lovely wife Bernadine Dohrn announced their intentions to overthrow the United States government and the capitalistic system. In spite of the fact, that I met Bill years after these events, I have always thought of Bill as a man of convictions – a man that stands for what he believes in. The fact that, to this day, Bill stands the crimes he committed back in the 60’s is a tribute to his character and I refuse to disown him.

On the issue of my political mentor Frank Marshall Davis, as I wrote in my book Dreams of My Father, “he was full of hard-earned knowledge.” Frank, meant a lot to me in my formative years. The fact that he joined the American Communist Party during WWII was incidental to my formation. It was not until 1979 when he advised me to move to Chicago to attend Occidental college and only then that was I was able follow in Frank’s footsteps by becoming involved with far-left political groups – a position that I have maintained throughout my political career. To Frank and his communist ideals, I owe what I am today. My far left position in my brief Senate history, is a testament to my convictions and to Frank’s influence in my political life.

As far as the continued disparagements of my empty speeches, America you must understand that I have been trained to speak eloquently and preach on what people want to hear. You see, you must be politically expedient if you are running for any political office, especially that of President of our nation. I just know mainstream America will vote on my charismatic appeal, and many will not be able to be able to discern on what I am really all about. As a matter of fact, I am definitely counting on the vote of those that can’t tell the difference. To prove my point, so far, in spite of the fact that I consider small towns in America are still clinging to guns and religious values, I was able to get away with it, proven by the fact that I beat Hillary in the primaries and I am running ahead of Mc Cain in the polls. You know the adage: “if it isn’t broken, don’t fix it”. So far, I have been able to get away with pontificating trivialities and convert pap into utterly significant issues on my platform, and…it works. So why not? I just know real meaningful issues tend to confuse voters all around. So…please let me continue with my condescending speeches.

On the issue of my association with convicted felon Tony Resko for political corruption and illegal fund raisers, understand America that my real estate dealings with Tony were all but illegal. I consider Tony a great person, a personal friend, and a great supporter of my Civil Rights activism in Chicago. I knew about Tony’s dubious fund raising campaigns but never participated with him in them. My association with Tony only goes as far as his supporting my Illinois Senate campaign and that’s about it.

On my stand as to important social issues such socialized health-care and increased taxation to upper-class and Corporate America, you have to understand that my association with Marxists professors during my college years, had a great impact in my political outlook of capitalism in America. You must acknowledge the fact that the only means of balancing our economy is through a re-distribution of wealth amongst the classes. If you are white and rich, you must do your part. You must subsidize the less privileged and impoverished. That’s just the way it is with communism: a system that has been long overdue in the U.S.

As to my anti-Semitic association with campaign endorsers such as Louis Farrakhan and the Black Panthers, you must be understanding of the fact that Israel is to our Islamic world, what the U.S., is to the Islamic Muslim extremists. We have to be more attuned to our continued aggression to the Arab nations and to what they stand for. Our ‘Ugly American’ image must be dealt with once and for all. It is about time we deal with our true enemies: the Jews. Why, America, do you think I have proposed to meet with all our purported enemies unconditionally? I praise Jimmy Carter for his recent meeting with Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal. Remember it is very important that we refrain from our historical world supremacy as a means to defending our nation and our values. We must sit down and talk with Iran’s Mahmud Ahmadi-Nejad, Cuba’s Fidel and Raul Castro, Venezuela’s Chavez, maybe even Osama Bin Laden. Wars and terrorism in the world must come to an end. We must retrieve our troops from Iraq, and just let the Taliban come back to show our good faith with that nation and the rest of the terrorist in the world. It is imperative that we advertise to the world that we are not as powerful as we have claimed to be over the years. That we are not a threat to them anymore. We should, as a matter of fact, open our borders and do away with our Homeland Security. After all, who can stand all those long lines at our nation’s airports?
And yes... as to my white lies during the campaign you must be forgiving. And, by the way, when I refer to as "white" lies, please, no relation to race. I did lie about my being conceived during Selma, Alabama walks during the Martin Luther King days. I did lie about my father's coming to the U.S., in a cultural exchange programs promoted by the Kennedys, but please America, you must be reasonable. There are many times when you need to be politically expedient. Remember, the end justifies the means. A little lying here and there will almost always go un-noticed and, after all, I am running for President.

Finally, my fellow Americans, I appeal to your benevolence due to the mitigating circumstances that surround my persona, who I am and what I stand for. Imagine you had been born of a white Kansas woman and black Islamic Kenyan father and you were conceived in an extra-marital relationship. Imagine that your father abandoned you when you were two years old. Imagine your mother went on to marry another Indonesian black Islamic stepfather who abandons your mother again. Imagine being raised by your white grandparents who are not particularly fond of blacks. Imagine growing up with Wahabi teachings and being part of an African tribe. Imagine having mentors as Pastor Wright and Frank Davis and be running for President under a Bush administration. I would think you would agree with me in that I am a confused and traumatized person. I just know if Sigmund Freud were alive today, he would embrace my case and would endorse me as the poster child for an Identity Crisis fundraiser. I just know it.

Notice I have purposely left out of all this my lovely wife Michelle. What can I say about Michelle. She has been an inspiration to my life and to my political career. From the moment I met her, I just knew Michelle was the one. Her college thesis: ‘Princeton Educated Blacks and the Black Community” and her obvious resentment towards whites, just helped to enhance an awareness of our compatibility. Her devout companionship every Sunday, as we listened to Pastor Wright, our mentor, was reason enough to renew our vows in marriage. Michelle is the most uninhibited and sincere person I have ever met. The fact that she came out and let America know that she was not proud of her country, is only a testament to her convictions and her values. I can’t say enough about Michelle.

So…there you have it America, I really hope that you now have a better understanding of Barack Hussein Obama, your candidate for President of the United States of America. I hope you find it in your heart of hearts to support my candidacy and to put an end to the personal slandering and smears that I have suffered in the past few months. My clarification of each and every one of the issues should in and of itself be thought of as bastions of my character and my judgment. I realize that for many of you, the issues I have brought forth are irrelevant and that you will vote for me no matter what. I know that my charisma and eloquence will be enough to earn your vote in November. To my conservative republican enemies, I stand on the merits of my clarification of the issues to sway your votes. GOD BLESS AMERICA.

Barack Hussin Obama

Wednesday, June 11, 2008


My fellow-Americans:

On September 11, 2001, the terrorist world declared war on our nation. Albeit a vitrolic new type of warfare unable to discern between civilians and the military. As Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad threatens to develop new nuclear weapons capable of destroying our country and as other militant Islamic Muslims continue to build-up their weapons of mass destruction in their campaign to destroy us, it would be reasonable to assume that our goverment would be akin to the evident threats facing our nation. It would also be reasonable to assume that our goverment be ready, willing and able to make a statement of military supremacy as a deterrant to these threats.

Ironicall, candidate Barack Obama, in what could be construed as the ultimate model of demagoguery, ensuing from a political platform that focuses on the withdrawal of our troops from Iraq and professed proposals for peace-talks with our worst enemies, is now proposing to disarm our country, as though to assert the enemy that a lack of military prowess would be a good enough reason for them to refrain from their sinister objectives. Please, go to the hyperlink below to judge for yourselves what this dubious Presidential candidate proposes for defending ur country.



Born: August 4, 1961

Race: Mixed - Black and White.


1967 – 1971: Jakarta, Indonesia. Elementary school. Honolulu, Hawaii.

1971 - 1979 : Hawaii. Panahou Academy. Graduates High-School. Relates that at this school he struggles to reconcile his multiracial heritage, admits to using alcohol, marijuana and cocaine.

1979 – 1983: Columbia University, New York. Major: Political Science. Develops close associations with Marxists professors at this institution.

1988 – 1991: Harvard Law School. Graduate. Magna Cum Laude.

Marital Status: Married Michelle Obama 1992 who claimed to be proud of America, only as of her husband’s candidacy for the Presidency. For her thesis, in college chooses the theme of “Anti-Black Racism”.

Work Experience:

2006 – 2008: Campaigns in primaries as Democratic candidate vs. Senator Hillary Clinton.

2004 – 2006: November 2004, elected to U.S. Senate from State of Illinois. Delivered keynote speech at Democratic National Convention in support of Presidential Democratic candidate John Kerry. Earns the title of the most liberal, left-wing Senator in the U.S. Senate.
Religious Affiliations:

1985 - 2008 Barack Obama joins Trinity United Church in the South side of Chicago. An active member of this Church for 20 years, led by pastor Jeremiah Wright – a professed anti- American, anti-White, black liberation theology extremist. Obama embraces pastor Wright as his religious mentor, refusing to disown him, until becoming politically expedient in his primary race.

In 2006, Obama campaigns in Kenya for cousin Raila Odinga – a radical Islamist, running in a Socialist/ Communist ticket. Mr. Odinga was a member of the “Lou” tribe, where Obama was also a former member in earlier years. The Lou tribe brethrens went on a murdering rampage of non-Islamic Churches after Odinga’s defeat. At a public rally in Nairobi, Obama praises cousin Odinga for his extreme Islamic platform, committed to banning gospel crusades by worshippers of the cross.

Political Affiliations:

1970 – 1990 Barack Obama befriends Frank Marshall Davis, a black writer, member of the Communist Party in America. Obama refers to Davis as his political mentor.

In 1979, Obama becomes involved with far-left associations such as the ‘Democratic Socialists of America or DSA and ‘Students for a Democratic Society” or SDS. The DSA was known to be the largest Socialist organization in the U.S. - an affiliate of ‘Socialist International’.

Barack Obama solicits endorsement of the ‘New Party’ for his first Illinois, State Senate race. The ‘New Party’ was a Marxist coalition with a platform of enunciates aimed at electing left wing candidates to public office.

Barack Obama befriends William C. Ayers and wife Bernadine Dohrn, members of the ‘Weather Underground Organization’ – an organization committed to the overthrow of the United States government. In 1974 the WUO, calls for a unified Communist Party in America.

1990 -2008 Barack Obama has dubious dealings with Tony Resko, convicted in Chicago for illegal campaign fund-raising contributions and extortion schemes to influence politicians.

In the primary campaign as the Democratic candidate for the Presidency of the United States, Barack Obama gains the endorsements of the most extremist black leaders and their supporters such as: Louis Farrakahn, the Black Panthers, Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton. All of them united by a common hate-filled platform that demands an end to capitalism, re-distribution of wealth among the classes via taxation of the upper classes and a government subsidized economy that provides free health-care, free- housing and the creation of a Black Independent Nation within the nation.

Frank Chapman, a member of the U.S.’s Communist Party writes of Obama’s victory in the primaries: “Obama’s victory was more than a progressive move – it was a dialectical leap ushering in a qualitatively new era of struggle.”

In one of Obama’s campaign quarters we find a Cuban flag superimposed with a portrait of Che Gevara. Obama refuses to wear American flag pin on his lapel and to pledge allegiance to the flag or put his hand over his heart during the pledge. He proposes to have unconditional meetings with all extremist leaders that oppose the United States. He is endorsed and revered as a hero by the leaders of ‘Take Back America’ – a diabolical organization that thrives in undermining traditional and conservative values of our nation.

So…there you have it folks. Can’t say we didn’t tell you. The most extremist, radical and terrorist organizations within the Arab nations; the perpetrators of 9-11 have promised to destroy the U.S. They have proclaimed that the only way to accomplish their sinister objective will be do it from within the U.S. Karl Marx in ‘The Communist Manifesto’, written in 1848, says: “the move to socialism can happen and will happen only after capitalism has run its full course…, thus the United States, in particular, would be the ideal society for the start of Communism.”

Barack Obama is an intelligent, eloquent speaker. He is articulate and charismatic. He has a keen sense of demagoguery and for what mainstream America wants to hear. So did Fidel Castro in Cuba back in 1959. Obama is currently leading McCain in the polls. He is getting closer and closer to the White House and the Presidency of the most powerful nation in the world. If, after you have read this resume, still decide to pull the lever for this man, guess what? We’ll be glad you did. There comes a time, when we should all just stop trying to show liberal-mainstream America that the handwriting is on the wall. If it happens, so be it. At that time, we should all join in with Obama’s political mentor Frank Chapman and his Communist Party in praising our country’s new President Barack Obama and his lovely First Lady, wife Michelle. If it happens… God Bless the America that was ! And, GOD SAVE AMERICA of the future!

Tuesday, April 29, 2008


I don’t know about you, but I am beginning to give up in trying to fight the Democrat’s battle. As far as I am concerned, the word “Democrat” and the “Democratic Party”, have taken on a whole new life of their own, as of the 1970’s. I recently saw an HBO mini-series called “John Adams”, and it was sad to see what the true Democratic Party was all about compared to today. Talk about true American values. This mini-series should be required viewing in all schools of our nation.

Today’s democrats have re-invented themselves under banners such as “liberal” and “left-wingers”. I personally fail to see the difference between these two terms as compared to socialism and communism. As used in the context of modern politics, liberal left-wingers are nothing short of the political prototypes so advocated by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in The Communist Manifesto, written in 1848.

Notice how In the last twenty years or so, the platforms of the Democratic Party and their liberal left-wing leaders, have degenerated to where just about all the issues and slogans are viciously aimed at undermining capitalism. Notice how, to them, having made it in America is nothing short of being evil. A sin for which you must be punished with taxation. There is a hateful and sinister resentment among liberal democrats against those who “made it” – a dramatic change in the incentives, wouldn’t you say? In other words, if you made it, you are going to pay for it. Ironically, many of these liberal democrats are themselves rather wealthy, yet I don’t see many of them preaching what they pray as shown in their unwillingness to re-distribute their wealth among the less fortunate. I only see them donating money, exclusively as means of sheltering taxation to defend and protect their wealth.

At the rate we going, the time will come, not too long from now I may add, when liberal Democrats, will probably want the abolition of private property and instigation of a “working class proletariat” up-rise, as mainstream issues in their platforms. I listen to the liberal [democratic] media, and with every sound-byte, I hear the drum beat of a class struggle in America. Racism is alive and well in America, and I am not really referring to the historical white vs. black racism, but the other way around, it is now black and white racism alike, against the wealthy and capitalist America. It is the drum beat of Marx’s proposed struggles between the classes - the “haves” and “have nots”. I am really, really sick of liberal democrats’ boring chants about their anti-war protest. We may remind all of them, that it has been precisely through wars, starting back with the American Revolution to the Iraq war, that this nation has been able to uphold its peace. Need only to refresh their memories of 9/11 and ask them [liberal democrats], who is really waging the wars and what would happen if we the US, had not fought them. Ask any Jewish survivor of the Nazi’s death camps, what would have happened to them without a war. Ask Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda, and Hamas, what would happen if our country would cease to defend itself against their commitment to destroy our nation. It is really sick to listen to this people.

Unfortunately, I am sad to say, we have to admit that we, right-wing conservatives are a dying breed. Like I said at the beginning, I am reaching that point where, I am just about ready to give it all up and let all the liberal democrats in America have a taste of their own medicine. You and I and people like us, who are still trying to fight their battle, continue to be chastised for doing it. The time has come, perhaps, when we just should not waste our time anymore in trying to reason with them. I really believe our energy could be put to worthier endeavors.

I am convinced millions of liberal democrats do not think of themselves as communists. Indeed, I am sure many think of themselves as idealists and politically prolific as they have not yet been able to see through their Democratic Party’s twisted ideals. We can’t blame them. Communism, socialism, leftist-liberalism, is everywhere in America. It is in all college campuses of the nation, most T.V. stations and virtually every leading newspaper. To the young men and women of America today, being liberal is even become fashionable. It’s Chic. It’s become a lifestyle. To the old, the less adept, the failed, their Party’s slogans are preying on their hopes for government to take care of their problems – a preferred tactic of communism - which they [liberals] proudly call “government regulation”.

We can ask ourselves the question: should we continue fighting their battle anymore? Isn’t it about time we just throw in the towel and let them suffer, once and for all, the consequences? I can’t help but recall that Carl Marx professing the Western World [USA], as the ideal state for trying his model of Communism, while contending that the later could only be achieved through capitalism, thus concluding that the US would be the ideal place to roll the model.

For many liberal Americans, our cries to defend this country and capitalism carry a dose of are aberrational disorder. Considering the persistent controversial consequences that arise out of merely trying to preserve our founding father’s values, we ask: should we continue fighting this, their battle anymore?

I am almost to the point that I am willing to vote for Barak Obama or Hillary Clinton. I don’t know about you, but I am ready for the worst. I am ready to propose a Democratic ticket with Bill Ayers as Vice-President. In the foreign policy arena, I would nominate Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton as our ambassadors to the Middle East. I would move Hollywood to the Gaza strip for top virtual reality action movies. I would propose complete nuclear disarmament program by all nations of the world, except for Korea, Syria and Afghanistan and would introduce legislation to Congress to subsidize and aid these countries in a nuclear expansion program. I would propose for the OPEC nations and Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez to continue in their quest to raise the world’s crude-oil prices until such a time that most people in the world are walking or ridding bicycles. I would disenfranchise NATO, and immediately bring back all American troops, starting obviously with our men in Iraq. I would let Osama Bin Laden, assisted by the Castro brothers, Fidel and Raul create a new army to maintain peace in the world. I would oust the Pope and proclaim Islamic Muslim, the world’s universal faith. I would urge Russia, Albania, Bulgaria, China, Cuba, Chile, Czechoslovakia, the German Democratic Republic, Hungary, the People’s Republic of Korea, Poland, Romania and Vietnam to re-emerge vindicated of their Communist failures – fear the US no more, as we will be one of them. I would discuss with Nelson Mandela the possibility of giving the entire country of Africa back to all African-Americans – after all, the pseudonym was adopted a few years back in anticipation of this happening. I would let every prisoner of war free and convert Guantanamo Bay into a beach resort for transient Arabs. I would urge every scientist in the world to unite with Al Gore in global cooling program. About conservation, need not worry anymore, as we will not have cars, little industry, so…no emissions. I would do away with the army and the air force as there will be no more wars. However, I would keep the Navy and the marines, with a new assignment to pursue of Mel Fisher’s dream of finding sunken treasures. I would give Israel back to the Palestinians and relocate Jews into vacated African American communities after the exodus to Africa.

As far as domestic policies are concerned, I am ready to propose Jeremiah Wright for Chief Justice in the Supreme Court and would immediately abolish the pledge of allegiance to the flag for a “God Dam America” pledge. I am ready to have the New York Times as our only newspaper in the nation and MSNBC and NBC as the only TV stations in the US. I am ready for letting government control every aspect of our lives. I am ready to wipe out capitalism, entrepreneurship and bring complete and total equality for all. I am ready for a complete and total ban on the freedom of speech and religion. I am ready for a complete eradication of all conservatives and republicans of our nation, and the start of a witch-hunt, followed by a burning at the stakes of all T.V. and radio conservative anchors such as Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity. I would start the bonfire with President Bush and keep the fire alive by throwing in any registered republicans or admitted conservatives. I am ready for a reformed Education Program, designed specifically to re-program children in America into becoming true liberals, including a rebellion against parents who may disavow government control. I am also ready for a reformed Health-Care Program. Free health-care for everyone. No insurance - a system whereby a new breed of economically un-motivated doctors, would be ready to treat you accordingly and a renewed Hippocratic Oath predicated exclusively on public charity. I am ready for a complete abolition of the IRS and taxation; after all, the rich will be there no longer. I propose for a one-party system – the liberal party obviously. The party would have only one leader and closely held elections supervised by Jimmy Carter.

My dear fellow-conservatives, this article thrives on satire as a preferred means of making our point, if yet in a refreshing mode as a desperate alternative to reasoning about the impending threats facing our nation today. I hasten to tell you that, historically, we have seen thriving empires fallen to less powerful predators in the past. There are clear and present dangers when one of your candidates for the Presidency is bound to be the most leftist senator in Congress. There are clear and present dangers when your candidates for the Presidency outright lie to the American public. There are real and present dangers, when one of your candidates for the Presidency of the US, reveres a man who dams America, whites and the rich. There is real and present danger when one of your candidates for the Presidency of the US, commingles with an admitted terrorist, who once bombed mayor US institutions and, to this day, regrets not having bombed more.

I don’t know about you, but I am that stage where I can no longer care if the issues on this satire become reality. For many of us, utopia will be to say: “I told you so…” their eternal damnation will, more than not, have justified our cause and our wasted efforts. I am just about ready to accept this Armageddon, so long as they continue to ignore and ridicule our pleas. I am just about ready to quit fighting their battle any longer. Should you continue fighting their battle any longer?

Friday, April 25, 2008


Jimmy Carter was the 39th President of the United States. In ten surveys of historians which ranked US presidents, which included over 1000 scholars, the ranking of Carter's presidency ranged from #19 to #34.
No matter the ranking, President Carter, will undoubtedly go down in history with the dubious distinction of being one of the worst Presidents in the history of the nation – that is to say, if not the worst.

Carter’s foreign policy presidency was marred by several major crises, including the takeover of the American embassy and holding of hostages by Iranian extremists, a failed rescue attempt, serious fuel shortages and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Domestically, Carter’s failures are equally if not more evident, as during his presidency, the economy reach double-digit inflation as prime rate rose to 21.5% - highest in US history under any president. During the Carter administration productivity growth in the United States declined to an average annual rate of 1 percent, compared to 3.2 percent of the 1960s. There was also a growing federal budget deficit which increased to 66 billion dollars, leading to a sharp recession in the 1980’s.

During his first month in office Carter cut the defense budget by $6 billion. His proneness to weakness in foreign affairs became ever so evident in his controversial give-away of the Panama Canal in September 1977, committing to give the later back to Panamanians at 12:00 noon in December 1999. Carter’s Panama Treaty was only the beginning of an embarrassing legacy of ignoble diplomacy.
Be you a democrat or a republican, Carter’s unapologetic blunders, are reprehensible and shameful – the man is despicable. His hypocritical and whimsy character can best be illustrated in his double standard throughout the conflict of human rights and US interest in Carter’s dealing with the Shah of Iran. The Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, had been a strong ally of America since World War II and was one of the "twin pillars" upon which U.S. strategic policy in the Middle East was built.
On a state visit to Iran, Carter spoke out in favor of the Shah, calling him a leader of supreme wisdom, and a pillar of stability in the volatile Middle East. When the Iranian Revolution broke out in Iran, and the Shah was overthrown, the U.S. did not intervene. The Shah went into permanent exile. Carter refused him entry to the United States, even on grounds of medical emergency. Carter’s seditions to US in his self-appointed ambassadorship of evil betrayals, have now become simply repulsive if yet disguised
by the Nobel Peace Prize – reason enough to question the righteousness of this prestigious award.

In 1994,Carter met with North Korean President Kim Il Sung, resulting in the signing of the Agreed Framework, under which North Korea agreed to stop processing nuclear fuel in exchange for a return to normalized relations, oil deliveries and two light water reactors to replace its graphite reactors. The Agreed Framework negotiated by Jimmy Carter was widely hailed at the time as a diplomatic achievement, but in 2005 North Korea announced that it had nuclear weapons and on October 9, 2006 backed up this assertion with the underground detonation of a low-yield nuclear device.
Carter visited Cuba in May 2002 and met with Fidel Castro. He was allowed to address the Cuban public on national television with a speech that he wrote and presented in Spanish. This made Carter the first President of the United States, in or out of office, to visit the island since the Cuban revolution of 1959. He also created uproar in the US when he was seen socializing and shaking hands with Castro at the funeral of former Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau in late 2000.
In recent years, Carter becomes a frequent critic of Israel's policies in Lebanon, West Bank and Gaza. Carter’s freelance diplomacy has been reason for wide spread criticism from both democrats and republicans alike.
As recently as last week, the London-based Arabic newspaper Al-Hayat reported that Carter was going to meet with exiled Hamas leader and professed terrorist Khaled Mashaal. As the two met, three Israeli soldiers were killed in the Gaza strip, by Hamas led militant militias. In his trip to the Middle East, Carter broke with US policy by laying a wreath on the grave of Yasser Arafat in Ramallah. In his book Palestine Peace Not Apartheid, published in November 2006, Carter accuses Israelis of being: “totally dominant and suppressing violence by depriving Palestinians of their basic human rights
How dare this man [Carter], even allude to “basic human rights”, as he has dedicated his life to a diplomatic digression aimed at galvanizing virtually every terrorist, dictator, militant extremist, and otherwise Anti-American leader in the world, in their continued hate-filled, insatiable political quest for the destruction of the US and democracy. How dare, this Ambassador of Evil, speak of human rights, as he chooses to befriend political states, which continue to harbor defendants of everything and anything that denies basic human rights to its constituents.
Mr. Carter, just so that you know, as you were visiting with Castro in Cuba, thousands of Cubans were fleeing and dying in rafts, while crossing the Florida Straights. As you were signing your treaties with North Korean President Kim Il Sung, Koreans were developing their nuclear arms. And as you visit with Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal, Hamas’s fanatics continue to plan attacks on Israel and the Western World such as our 9/11. Your Nobel Price, Mr. Carter, should not be for Peace, but for treason to your country. It’s about time, Mr. Carter, you give up on your failed ambassadorship. The free world would much better off, without your uninvited participation in foreign affairs. It pleases us to learn you were not welcomed in Israel, in your demonic trip to meet with Hamas. Time has come, perhaps, our State Department, joins in with our Israeli allies in unwelcoming you to the country you continue to undermine. Stay home in the Islamic militant Middle East with your Hamas. That’s were you really belong. The US does not want your kind of peace Mr. Ambassador of Evil.

Sunday, April 13, 2008


Common America, wake up and smell the coffee. It just seems as every time I turn on the news, Barack is trying to qualify, clarify, and justify, a blunder made at one of his sermons. That’s right, I don’t call them speeches anymore. I call them sermons as more and more of Reverend Jeremiah’s sound bytes become Obama's, if yet disguised by his elitist style of delivery.

Just in case you missed it, the Huffington Post Web site reported Friday that Obama, speaking of Pennsylvanians told supporters at a San Francisco fundraiser: “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years…And it’s not surprising they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

The next day, Obama admitted he chose his words poorly: “I didn’t say it as well as I should have…” but for the second day in a row he stood by the comments. Do you see the pattern? In all his blunders, the Reverend Wright affair, the Bill Ayers controversy, the man does what politicians do best, stand corrected and re-deliver through the use of carefully selected words, specifically designed to distract listeners from whatever caused the controversy. On the other hand, notice too, the pattern also has an embedded model of non-repentance, or detraction – as though to say, whether we like it or not, I am standing by the controversies.

Once again, Obama’s statement about small towns, all but hides his bitterness towards mainstream America, their religious values and their inalienable rights to
be against illegal immigrants and obscure trade policies. Obama portrays mainstream America as militant fanatics when he speaks of “clinging to guns”.

It is no wonder that your enrollment as a youth in the Wahabi school of radical Islamic teachings, followed by politically expedient change to the United Trinity Church lead by Reverend Wright, have had a serious influence in your political views when you dare condemn true religious values, unlike those taught by the militant Muslims. We have, Mr. Obama, many religious sects in the US – none of which I may add, rely on racism or divisiveness as their gospel. Regardless of the God, they rely in promoting racial equality and have never encouraged the use of arms for the purpose of destroying the United States as proclaimed by radical Islamist throughout the world.

This time around, I am sorry to say, Obamamaniacs, cannot allege their rhetorical defense of “guilt-by-association”. Too bad, as it was the candidate himself who blundered the comment about Americas’ small towns this time around. So...the guilt-by….is out. To now, Obamians, you have been able to get away with it. It was bound to happen though, he just can’t help himself. You know what they say: “you can lie to some of the people, some of the time, but not all of the people all the time.”

Your political / religious masquerade is starting to wear off. No sooner we wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt when you first started your race for the Presidency as our potentially first black American President, no sooner we were able to transcend the racial barriers, no sooner you’ve managed to shatter our hopes for these landmarks. It is truly a shame that, our hopes have now been turned into a great disappointment in you and what you stand for.

I blame not you for what you are. I blame your parents for abandoning you and letting you grow up as a confused young man, who’s caretakers made the decision to bring you up as a Wahabic follower – a faith that wages the Jihad wars against the western world. America’s small towns, Mr. Hussein Obama, do cling to religion and cling to bear arms not against their fellow-Americans but to defend and protect the Constitution of the United States of American and the nation for which it stands. It’s about time, Mr. Obama, that you define your pledge, sir!

Wednesday, April 9, 2008


Just in case you have not been able to keep up with some of the latest news on our beloved candidate for the Presidency, Barack Obama, and are wondering who is this sorry looking man in the mug shot to the left, and how is it related to candidate Obama. Well, first let me tell you a little about the repulsive human being in the picture and then I will tell you about him and Obama. The name of this monster is William [Bill] Ayers. Mr. Ayers first made headline news back in the 70’s, for his participation in a bombing of the New York Police Department. As member of the Weather Underground Group, a violent radical leftist organization, Mr. Ayers, admitted to participating also in the bombing of the Capitol Building in 1971, the Pentagon in 1972 and a building housing the State Department in 1975. After an intensive manhunt by the FBI, Mr. Ayers turns himself in and is later acquitted as charges are dropped for prosecutorial misconduct.

As a free man Mr. Ayers, writes his memoirs in a book entitled “Fugitive Days”. He chooses September 11, 2001 as the preferred date for publishing his book. In this same year [2001], in a New York Times interview aimed at promoting his book, Mr. Ayers talks about his involvement in the bombings and says: “I don’t regret setting the bombs, I feel we did not do enough”. O.K., so… how is this relative to Senator Barack Obama?

Well, lets start by saying that our dear Senator has had a “friendly” relationship with Mr. Ayers, that dates back to beginnings of Obama’s political carrier. In an article from ABC’s, New York Sun, reporter Jonah Goldberg writes of Ayers’s political relationship with Obama and says “a rite of passage when launching Obama’s career”, as the later allegedly had accepted Ayers’ campaign contributions in his race for the US Senate. When asked about Obama’s dubious relationship with Mr. Ayers, one of Obama’s spokesman says: “yes…they are friendly”. But wait… that’s not all. Does the story end here? Oh no, It gets better, a lot better – ask about the whereabouts of Mr. Ayers, today, 2008.

Today, we find Mr. Ayer sitting at Board of Directors of an extreme leftist foundation called “Wood Funds”, and guess who sat in the same board from 1999 to 2001? That’s right. You guessed it: Barack Obama. Wouldn’t you know? As a co-board member, Ayers and Obama, jointly approved of a donation to guess who? There you go. Right again – Jeremiah Wright and the United Trinity Church. Hello. Can the pattern be any clearer here, or am I missing something? The most extreme left-wing Senator in Washington, attends an Anti-American congregation and calls this militant church’s leader his spiritual mentor as the mentor preaches Anti-White sermons, and renounces to disown him, marries a woman who’s law school’s thesis is aimed at proving that “racism” is alive and well in one of the most prestigious schools of our nation, and claims not being able to be proud of America until his husband’s enters the race for President. Denies, his white heritage and fabricates stories enhancing his black blood, through continued fairy tales about how he and his black part of the family have been “one of them [blacks]”. In doing so he manages to demean a white grandmother that raised him and tells stories that never happened – father meeting during the Selma, Alabama riots, even though these took place five years after his birth; about the Kennedy’s air-lift choosing his father to come to America, on an air-lift that never happened. On and on and on. Repulsive, I should say.

With his now obvious selective memory, Senator Obama, meantime, chooses to discriminately remain quiet about his endorsement in 2006 of Socialist Kenyan cousin Raila Odinga in his run for the Presidency of that country. From the Jeremiah Wright incident to the so called “friendliness”, with Ayers - an admitted terrorist, the left-wing media of the country along with all other liberals who want this man to be our President, I keep hearing that all these issues should not be issues using the “guilt by association” defense. I dare say to all them, that our case is not based on guilty by association. Our case, my friends, is “guilt by participation”. That’s it. That simple. Enough is enough. You know how it goes: when you walk like a duck, quack like a duck…etc., Yes…you are duck.
I guess just about the only thing left to prove our point is to let him become President. Let all you left-wing liberals, socialist, anti-Americans, anti-Whites, have a taste of your medicine. Let your wonder boy, give away your country, raise taxes, subsidize the inept, give Iraq back to Al Qaeda, let Islamic extremist and terrorists all over the world, look upon the US as a weakened and vulnerable nation, where attacks as 9/11 are easy targets, as the lives lost then were relatively insignificant compared to that of our soldiers abroad and the need to bring them back. Go ahead Obamians, you can now have a Black Muslim extremist and an apologetic racist wife, right in the White House. God forbid, if that happens, I don’t know about you, but I would seriously consider calling my travel agent and booking myself in the next flight to any radical Muslim extremist Middle East country, get myself a turban, grow a beard, buy me a Koran and re-program myself in such a way that I can perhaps learn to understand what drives you to even consider this monster to be our President. After all, you know what say: “if you can beat them…join them.

I suggest and urge you that you click and go to the hyperlink below and see for yourself what I am talking about. And… if you agree with what I’ve written here, pass it on to your friends.


Saturday, April 5, 2008

Honoring The Dream

Last Tuesday, April 4th, marked the 40th anniversary of the death of Civil Rights leader, Dr. Martin Luther King. On this day alike, back in 1968, an assassin’s bullet deprives Dr. King from marching on with his crusade to make this nation a better place for blacks – a nation where equality, as envisioned by the founding fathers, would cease to be an issue worthy of political struggles, social divisiveness and otherwise militant extremes that had plagued our country’s history, dating as far back as our Declaration of Independence.
In 1963, four years prior to his untimely death, Dr. King delivers his now historical speech at the capital’s Lincoln Memorial: I Have A Dream. In his speech he says:

"I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.'"

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

One would hope and expect that Dr. King’s dream would have survived him as other black Civil Right leaders, carrying his torch and legacy, would one day have a black man as President of the same nation that a few years back, had riots in Selma, Alabama, advocating the rights of blacks merely to sit on a bus next to a white person.

As the days of Dr. King’s dream approached us in the person of Barack Obama, we can only wonder if, indeed, what this man stands for is what Dr. King was really dreaming of in his speech. The torch that led us to Obama was picked-up by others, who, unlike Dr. King, continue to demonize our country. They call themselves “Reverends” and use Church pulpits to deliver political sermons filled with hate, anti-Semitism, anti-Americanism and yes…anti-Whites.

The torch was carried by the likes of the Jessie Jacksons, the Al Sharptons, the Jeremiah Wrights, and the Louis Farrakahns, of our country. For years now, white Americans, guilt- ridden by the injustices that preceded the Civil Rights movement, and driven by their repentance for racial sins committed in the past, have allowed these so-called Civil Right leaders carry on with their rhetorical campaigns against the white and the rich- as though, capitalism and being born white, were major evils of our society, thus providing their Machiavellic platforms. White America’s graciousness and political correctness has, more often than not, been confused with fear, and any time whites dare challenge these black racists, the “race-card” is immediately flagged at all poles in the nation.

In the forty years since Dr. King’s death, we have seen how blacks decided to create a nation within the nation by calling themselves African-Americans. Notwithstanding a right to honor your heritage, I cannot fully understand, why someone born in this country, regardless of sex, race and creed, shall elect to be call themselves anything but American –save for those born elsewhere and later came to this country.

As despicable as the use of the N….word is, as despicable I find the adopted label which deviously contends an all-American identity. It is no wonder that Reverend Jeremiah Wright, dams America. And no wonder that Barrack Obama, a loyal follower of Mr. Wright, writes in one his books: "Any distinction between good and bad whites held negligible meaning."
While honoring Dr. King’s death anniversary and his speech in the Lincoln Memorial, we wonder if he were alive today, indeed his dream was to have a black President that professes that “not all men are created equal”, or for one of Obama’s mentors, Louis Farrakhan to say: “he wished that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged."
We share in Dr. King’s dream that: “one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." Regretfully though, the one time that Dr. King’s dream comes to life, the “Chosen” one has shattered it. We honor and respect your dream Dr. King, but we honestly believe that Barack Obama does not share it. Maybe the time has come when we Americans expunge, using Farrakhan’s words, Obama and all those that don’t share it. Then, and only then can the dream come true and we join in claiming: “We All Have A Dream”.

Friday, April 4, 2008


On the left of this picture, my friends, is the disgusting image of a man disguised under the ecclesiastical habit of a catholic priest. His name is Michael Pfleger, shown in this picture along with his spiritual (political) ally, Reverend Louis Farrakahn. Pfleger, dares call himself “Father”, while preaching a gospel that’s probably precisely the opposite of everything and anything that the Catholic Church and all churches, regardless of their denomination, for that matter, stand for. As a matter of fact, his pulpit manners clone those of Wright and Farrakahn. (See video link below).

Mr. Pfleger, made headline news this week, in a political sermon from the pulpit of his St. Sabina Church in Chicago while claiming to support Reverends Wright and Farrakahn, condoning these two for their militant anti-semitism, anti-americanism, and racist gospels, damming all who were critical of the two Reverends.

Mr. Pfleger is a disgrace to the Catholic Church, to all Catholics, to all Americans, and to all churches of this nation. Problem is we don’t do anything about it. I am inviting all Catholics throughout to write, or fax to your Archdioceses and their leaders to protest against this man and what he stands for. Mr. Pfleger is undeserving of the church he represents. We urge all of our Archbishops around the nation to take action and excommunicate this man, disbar him from his false priesthood and let him move on to other political stages, where he can continue to preach his gospel of hate for his fellow-man. You may write or fax your comments as they will not open unsolicited emails, to the following addresses:

Archdiocese of Miami:
Archbishop John C. Favarola
9401 Biscayne Blvd.
Miami Shores, Florida 33138
Telf. (305)-757-6241
Fax: (305)-754-1797

Archdiocese of Chicago:
His Eminence Francis Cardinal Jorge Omi
P.O. Box 1979
Chicago, Illinois, 60690-1979

Papal Basilica of St. Peter-Vatican
General Information Fax: 39-06-698-85518

If you want to link to Fox News and watch video on Father Pfleger, highlight the sentence below, right click on your mouse and select “Open Hyperlink”. Once on the sight, right click on “Catholic Controversy”. Make sure you are on an empty stomach when you do it.

Breaking News Latest News Current News - FOXNews.com

Saturday, March 29, 2008

Want to Talk About Lying?

During the past few weeks, the American public has had to endure the false claims, distortions, and flat out lies from both Democratic candidates, Senator Barack Obama and Senator Hillary Clinton. As if this wasn’t enough, we’ve also had to listen to Democratic Strategists’ continued defenses by trying to brainwash the nation into believing that there were not lies, but mere blunders of sort. The excuses have taken a life of their own as we are all expected to accept the “lying” and believe its swift transformation into political embellishment, exaggerations, misspoken words, even denials. All in all, we can only conclude that the candidates as well as their surrogates must think of the American public as a nation of fools – we believe everything our candidates tell us and, somehow, we will never learn the truth.
To both of you, Senator Obama, Senator Clinton and to your loyal herd of excusers, sorry, not quite. You are not really going to get away with it. Not this time. To prove our point, we have compiled a list of your most blatant and infamous lies and we are committed to sharing it with all our fellow-Americans and let each and everyone decide for themselves. Senators, our nation is not as naïve as you may think. We urge you to stop your lies and give more credit to the American people.

Senator Hillary Clinton’s Lies

1.- In an airport, she happened to run into Sir Edmund Hillary, the first man to climb Mt. Everest. She tells the man that her mother named her Hillary after him. Only problem – Mr. Hillary didn’t make news climbing anything until 5 years after Senator Clinton was born.

2.- In another story, from her book Living History, Senator Clinton talks about how in her high-school years she was on a soccer team and had a race-related incident with a black student, as she tried making a point about her intimate knowledge of racism. Too bad as there were no soccer teams at her high school in the 1960’s, when this incident was supposed to have taken place.

3.- There is also the well known lie where Hillary claimed that her daughter Chelsea was in danger on the September 11 attack, claiming that her daughter had gone jogging down in the towers when the planes hit as she [Hillary] saw the buildings right there and was nearly in peril. Too bad again, since Chelsea totally disclaimed her mother’s story in a magazine article, where she admits to being on the opposite side of the city and was woken up with a phone call telling her to watch the news.

4.- In a recent campaign speech, Senator Hillary Clinton claimed to have been endangered by sniper fire while landing in Bosnia back in March 1996 on a goodwill trip to the Balkans. Senator Clinton said: “I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of greeting ceremony at the airport…but instead, we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base.”
Too bad, a CBS video of the Senator’s visit to Bosnia was made public later in the week. In the video, rather than dodging the hostile sniper attack, Mrs. Clinton and daughter Chelsea are shown being greeted by an eight year old child and Bosnia’s acting President. Jokes were made by U.S. soldiers that the only shots the Senator could have heard were those from the practice range. Comedian “Simbad” who was also present with Senator Clinton during the Bosnia visit, declared that he was not aware of any sniper fire as claimed by the Senator.

Senator Barack Obama’s Lies

1.- One of Obama’s most used themes in his political escalation, is about his work in the re-construction of a despaired building conglomerate in Chicago, back in the 1980’s, better known as Altgeld Gardens, which provided housing for black Veterans of World War II. Senator Obama, takes self-credit for being a community organizer responsible for the re-construction of this building. Residents of Altgeld Gardens remain upset at Obama’s characterization. Hazel Johnson, who has lived at Altgeld Gardens since 1962 says: “I like him, he is a nice, young and intelligent man, but some of the things he said are not true”, said Johnson. To this date the buildings remain dilapidated, boarded up with fences surrounding much of the property. Other residents say: “he just didn’t do the work he says he did”.

2.- In a trip to Selma, Alabama in February 2006, in an attempt to gain popularity among an all black audience honoring heroes of the civil rights era, Obama defames his grandfather Onyango Obama. Barack told Selmans that grandfather Onyango was a “boy” to the British. Fact is that Onyango was well educated and wealthy and had a great relationship with the British – living a British life and adopting British ways. Admitting to these facts would have been devastating to Obama’s fabrication about a family past designed to relate and gain political popularity in the audience.

3.- In an effort to gain the sympathy and relate to the suffering of the Selma’s civil right audience in exchange for his personal grandeur, Obama fabricates another story about the Kennedy’s proposing an air lift and saying: “This young man Barack Obama [Barack Obama, Sr.], got one of those tickets”. Fact is Barrack Obama Sr., arrived in Hawaii two years before Kennedy even ran for the presidency. There was no Kennedy air lift and no “ticket” bringing his father to America.

4.- Obama tells the story as to how his parents met in the Selma riots in 1965. He says: “There was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma,…so [my parents] got together and I was born.” Fact is Obama was born in 1961. The Selma riots took place in 1965. By the time of the Selma riot, Barack, Sr., had abandoned Obama’s mother and moved back to Kenya.

5.- Fast forwarding to more recent episodes of the compulsive lying behavior, upon realizing the political devastation that could be brought upon his candidacy by the inflammatory remarks against the U.S., and whites made by his spiritual mentor Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Obama claims not have knowledge of the preacher’s radical views, in spite of the fact that he had been attending Wright’s congregation for the past twenty years.

Bottom line America, these are two phonies, with a congenital lying disorder. We have to, however, cut some slack to Senator Clinton and be more forgiving as, after all, remember who she married. The man who, while holding the office of President, tells our nation: “I have never had sex with that woman”, and I smoked Marihuana but…”I did not inhale”. Lying, in the Clinton household, seems to be an accepted pattern of behavior. So, as far as Senator Clinton is concerned, let’s just say, she just couldn’t help it.

Obama on the other hand, seems to be a troubled young man, with no one to blame but maybe his mother and father, both of whom chose to abandon him. Whatever the case may be, America we have two dysfunctional candidates running for the highest office in the land. Their dysfunctional behavior, we might add, would be fine, were it not for the fact that if, any of these two, are given the power they are seeking, it could only spell disaster for our nation’s future.

There is still time, America to call the Democratic candidates’ bluff. Let’s just send them back to the Senate, not that this is where they belong either, but not the Presidency. Regardless and meantime, we suggest these two seek psychiatric help for their obvious personal disorders. They and the nation would be better off. Whomever that psychiatrist may be, he or she, must be cautioned, however, to be aware these two are arrogantly manipulative and persuasive – we do hope science can read through them though. We did.