Tuesday, April 29, 2008


I don’t know about you, but I am beginning to give up in trying to fight the Democrat’s battle. As far as I am concerned, the word “Democrat” and the “Democratic Party”, have taken on a whole new life of their own, as of the 1970’s. I recently saw an HBO mini-series called “John Adams”, and it was sad to see what the true Democratic Party was all about compared to today. Talk about true American values. This mini-series should be required viewing in all schools of our nation.

Today’s democrats have re-invented themselves under banners such as “liberal” and “left-wingers”. I personally fail to see the difference between these two terms as compared to socialism and communism. As used in the context of modern politics, liberal left-wingers are nothing short of the political prototypes so advocated by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in The Communist Manifesto, written in 1848.

Notice how In the last twenty years or so, the platforms of the Democratic Party and their liberal left-wing leaders, have degenerated to where just about all the issues and slogans are viciously aimed at undermining capitalism. Notice how, to them, having made it in America is nothing short of being evil. A sin for which you must be punished with taxation. There is a hateful and sinister resentment among liberal democrats against those who “made it” – a dramatic change in the incentives, wouldn’t you say? In other words, if you made it, you are going to pay for it. Ironically, many of these liberal democrats are themselves rather wealthy, yet I don’t see many of them preaching what they pray as shown in their unwillingness to re-distribute their wealth among the less fortunate. I only see them donating money, exclusively as means of sheltering taxation to defend and protect their wealth.

At the rate we going, the time will come, not too long from now I may add, when liberal Democrats, will probably want the abolition of private property and instigation of a “working class proletariat” up-rise, as mainstream issues in their platforms. I listen to the liberal [democratic] media, and with every sound-byte, I hear the drum beat of a class struggle in America. Racism is alive and well in America, and I am not really referring to the historical white vs. black racism, but the other way around, it is now black and white racism alike, against the wealthy and capitalist America. It is the drum beat of Marx’s proposed struggles between the classes - the “haves” and “have nots”. I am really, really sick of liberal democrats’ boring chants about their anti-war protest. We may remind all of them, that it has been precisely through wars, starting back with the American Revolution to the Iraq war, that this nation has been able to uphold its peace. Need only to refresh their memories of 9/11 and ask them [liberal democrats], who is really waging the wars and what would happen if we the US, had not fought them. Ask any Jewish survivor of the Nazi’s death camps, what would have happened to them without a war. Ask Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda, and Hamas, what would happen if our country would cease to defend itself against their commitment to destroy our nation. It is really sick to listen to this people.

Unfortunately, I am sad to say, we have to admit that we, right-wing conservatives are a dying breed. Like I said at the beginning, I am reaching that point where, I am just about ready to give it all up and let all the liberal democrats in America have a taste of their own medicine. You and I and people like us, who are still trying to fight their battle, continue to be chastised for doing it. The time has come, perhaps, when we just should not waste our time anymore in trying to reason with them. I really believe our energy could be put to worthier endeavors.

I am convinced millions of liberal democrats do not think of themselves as communists. Indeed, I am sure many think of themselves as idealists and politically prolific as they have not yet been able to see through their Democratic Party’s twisted ideals. We can’t blame them. Communism, socialism, leftist-liberalism, is everywhere in America. It is in all college campuses of the nation, most T.V. stations and virtually every leading newspaper. To the young men and women of America today, being liberal is even become fashionable. It’s Chic. It’s become a lifestyle. To the old, the less adept, the failed, their Party’s slogans are preying on their hopes for government to take care of their problems – a preferred tactic of communism - which they [liberals] proudly call “government regulation”.

We can ask ourselves the question: should we continue fighting their battle anymore? Isn’t it about time we just throw in the towel and let them suffer, once and for all, the consequences? I can’t help but recall that Carl Marx professing the Western World [USA], as the ideal state for trying his model of Communism, while contending that the later could only be achieved through capitalism, thus concluding that the US would be the ideal place to roll the model.

For many liberal Americans, our cries to defend this country and capitalism carry a dose of are aberrational disorder. Considering the persistent controversial consequences that arise out of merely trying to preserve our founding father’s values, we ask: should we continue fighting this, their battle anymore?

I am almost to the point that I am willing to vote for Barak Obama or Hillary Clinton. I don’t know about you, but I am ready for the worst. I am ready to propose a Democratic ticket with Bill Ayers as Vice-President. In the foreign policy arena, I would nominate Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton as our ambassadors to the Middle East. I would move Hollywood to the Gaza strip for top virtual reality action movies. I would propose complete nuclear disarmament program by all nations of the world, except for Korea, Syria and Afghanistan and would introduce legislation to Congress to subsidize and aid these countries in a nuclear expansion program. I would propose for the OPEC nations and Venezuela’s Hugo Ch├ívez to continue in their quest to raise the world’s crude-oil prices until such a time that most people in the world are walking or ridding bicycles. I would disenfranchise NATO, and immediately bring back all American troops, starting obviously with our men in Iraq. I would let Osama Bin Laden, assisted by the Castro brothers, Fidel and Raul create a new army to maintain peace in the world. I would oust the Pope and proclaim Islamic Muslim, the world’s universal faith. I would urge Russia, Albania, Bulgaria, China, Cuba, Chile, Czechoslovakia, the German Democratic Republic, Hungary, the People’s Republic of Korea, Poland, Romania and Vietnam to re-emerge vindicated of their Communist failures – fear the US no more, as we will be one of them. I would discuss with Nelson Mandela the possibility of giving the entire country of Africa back to all African-Americans – after all, the pseudonym was adopted a few years back in anticipation of this happening. I would let every prisoner of war free and convert Guantanamo Bay into a beach resort for transient Arabs. I would urge every scientist in the world to unite with Al Gore in global cooling program. About conservation, need not worry anymore, as we will not have cars, little industry, so…no emissions. I would do away with the army and the air force as there will be no more wars. However, I would keep the Navy and the marines, with a new assignment to pursue of Mel Fisher’s dream of finding sunken treasures. I would give Israel back to the Palestinians and relocate Jews into vacated African American communities after the exodus to Africa.

As far as domestic policies are concerned, I am ready to propose Jeremiah Wright for Chief Justice in the Supreme Court and would immediately abolish the pledge of allegiance to the flag for a “God Dam America” pledge. I am ready to have the New York Times as our only newspaper in the nation and MSNBC and NBC as the only TV stations in the US. I am ready for letting government control every aspect of our lives. I am ready to wipe out capitalism, entrepreneurship and bring complete and total equality for all. I am ready for a complete and total ban on the freedom of speech and religion. I am ready for a complete eradication of all conservatives and republicans of our nation, and the start of a witch-hunt, followed by a burning at the stakes of all T.V. and radio conservative anchors such as Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity. I would start the bonfire with President Bush and keep the fire alive by throwing in any registered republicans or admitted conservatives. I am ready for a reformed Education Program, designed specifically to re-program children in America into becoming true liberals, including a rebellion against parents who may disavow government control. I am also ready for a reformed Health-Care Program. Free health-care for everyone. No insurance - a system whereby a new breed of economically un-motivated doctors, would be ready to treat you accordingly and a renewed Hippocratic Oath predicated exclusively on public charity. I am ready for a complete abolition of the IRS and taxation; after all, the rich will be there no longer. I propose for a one-party system – the liberal party obviously. The party would have only one leader and closely held elections supervised by Jimmy Carter.

My dear fellow-conservatives, this article thrives on satire as a preferred means of making our point, if yet in a refreshing mode as a desperate alternative to reasoning about the impending threats facing our nation today. I hasten to tell you that, historically, we have seen thriving empires fallen to less powerful predators in the past. There are clear and present dangers when one of your candidates for the Presidency is bound to be the most leftist senator in Congress. There are clear and present dangers when your candidates for the Presidency outright lie to the American public. There are real and present dangers, when one of your candidates for the Presidency of the US, reveres a man who dams America, whites and the rich. There is real and present danger when one of your candidates for the Presidency of the US, commingles with an admitted terrorist, who once bombed mayor US institutions and, to this day, regrets not having bombed more.

I don’t know about you, but I am that stage where I can no longer care if the issues on this satire become reality. For many of us, utopia will be to say: “I told you so…” their eternal damnation will, more than not, have justified our cause and our wasted efforts. I am just about ready to accept this Armageddon, so long as they continue to ignore and ridicule our pleas. I am just about ready to quit fighting their battle any longer. Should you continue fighting their battle any longer?

Friday, April 25, 2008


Jimmy Carter was the 39th President of the United States. In ten surveys of historians which ranked US presidents, which included over 1000 scholars, the ranking of Carter's presidency ranged from #19 to #34.
No matter the ranking, President Carter, will undoubtedly go down in history with the dubious distinction of being one of the worst Presidents in the history of the nation – that is to say, if not the worst.

Carter’s foreign policy presidency was marred by several major crises, including the takeover of the American embassy and holding of hostages by Iranian extremists, a failed rescue attempt, serious fuel shortages and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Domestically, Carter’s failures are equally if not more evident, as during his presidency, the economy reach double-digit inflation as prime rate rose to 21.5% - highest in US history under any president. During the Carter administration productivity growth in the United States declined to an average annual rate of 1 percent, compared to 3.2 percent of the 1960s. There was also a growing federal budget deficit which increased to 66 billion dollars, leading to a sharp recession in the 1980’s.

During his first month in office Carter cut the defense budget by $6 billion. His proneness to weakness in foreign affairs became ever so evident in his controversial give-away of the Panama Canal in September 1977, committing to give the later back to Panamanians at 12:00 noon in December 1999. Carter’s Panama Treaty was only the beginning of an embarrassing legacy of ignoble diplomacy.
Be you a democrat or a republican, Carter’s unapologetic blunders, are reprehensible and shameful – the man is despicable. His hypocritical and whimsy character can best be illustrated in his double standard throughout the conflict of human rights and US interest in Carter’s dealing with the Shah of Iran. The Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, had been a strong ally of America since World War II and was one of the "twin pillars" upon which U.S. strategic policy in the Middle East was built.
On a state visit to Iran, Carter spoke out in favor of the Shah, calling him a leader of supreme wisdom, and a pillar of stability in the volatile Middle East. When the Iranian Revolution broke out in Iran, and the Shah was overthrown, the U.S. did not intervene. The Shah went into permanent exile. Carter refused him entry to the United States, even on grounds of medical emergency. Carter’s seditions to US in his self-appointed ambassadorship of evil betrayals, have now become simply repulsive if yet disguised
by the Nobel Peace Prize – reason enough to question the righteousness of this prestigious award.

In 1994,Carter met with North Korean President Kim Il Sung, resulting in the signing of the Agreed Framework, under which North Korea agreed to stop processing nuclear fuel in exchange for a return to normalized relations, oil deliveries and two light water reactors to replace its graphite reactors. The Agreed Framework negotiated by Jimmy Carter was widely hailed at the time as a diplomatic achievement, but in 2005 North Korea announced that it had nuclear weapons and on October 9, 2006 backed up this assertion with the underground detonation of a low-yield nuclear device.
Carter visited Cuba in May 2002 and met with Fidel Castro. He was allowed to address the Cuban public on national television with a speech that he wrote and presented in Spanish. This made Carter the first President of the United States, in or out of office, to visit the island since the Cuban revolution of 1959. He also created uproar in the US when he was seen socializing and shaking hands with Castro at the funeral of former Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau in late 2000.
In recent years, Carter becomes a frequent critic of Israel's policies in Lebanon, West Bank and Gaza. Carter’s freelance diplomacy has been reason for wide spread criticism from both democrats and republicans alike.
As recently as last week, the London-based Arabic newspaper Al-Hayat reported that Carter was going to meet with exiled Hamas leader and professed terrorist Khaled Mashaal. As the two met, three Israeli soldiers were killed in the Gaza strip, by Hamas led militant militias. In his trip to the Middle East, Carter broke with US policy by laying a wreath on the grave of Yasser Arafat in Ramallah. In his book Palestine Peace Not Apartheid, published in November 2006, Carter accuses Israelis of being: “totally dominant and suppressing violence by depriving Palestinians of their basic human rights
How dare this man [Carter], even allude to “basic human rights”, as he has dedicated his life to a diplomatic digression aimed at galvanizing virtually every terrorist, dictator, militant extremist, and otherwise Anti-American leader in the world, in their continued hate-filled, insatiable political quest for the destruction of the US and democracy. How dare, this Ambassador of Evil, speak of human rights, as he chooses to befriend political states, which continue to harbor defendants of everything and anything that denies basic human rights to its constituents.
Mr. Carter, just so that you know, as you were visiting with Castro in Cuba, thousands of Cubans were fleeing and dying in rafts, while crossing the Florida Straights. As you were signing your treaties with North Korean President Kim Il Sung, Koreans were developing their nuclear arms. And as you visit with Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal, Hamas’s fanatics continue to plan attacks on Israel and the Western World such as our 9/11. Your Nobel Price, Mr. Carter, should not be for Peace, but for treason to your country. It’s about time, Mr. Carter, you give up on your failed ambassadorship. The free world would much better off, without your uninvited participation in foreign affairs. It pleases us to learn you were not welcomed in Israel, in your demonic trip to meet with Hamas. Time has come, perhaps, our State Department, joins in with our Israeli allies in unwelcoming you to the country you continue to undermine. Stay home in the Islamic militant Middle East with your Hamas. That’s were you really belong. The US does not want your kind of peace Mr. Ambassador of Evil.

Sunday, April 13, 2008


Common America, wake up and smell the coffee. It just seems as every time I turn on the news, Barack is trying to qualify, clarify, and justify, a blunder made at one of his sermons. That’s right, I don’t call them speeches anymore. I call them sermons as more and more of Reverend Jeremiah’s sound bytes become Obama's, if yet disguised by his elitist style of delivery.

Just in case you missed it, the Huffington Post Web site reported Friday that Obama, speaking of Pennsylvanians told supporters at a San Francisco fundraiser: “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years…And it’s not surprising they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

The next day, Obama admitted he chose his words poorly: “I didn’t say it as well as I should have…” but for the second day in a row he stood by the comments. Do you see the pattern? In all his blunders, the Reverend Wright affair, the Bill Ayers controversy, the man does what politicians do best, stand corrected and re-deliver through the use of carefully selected words, specifically designed to distract listeners from whatever caused the controversy. On the other hand, notice too, the pattern also has an embedded model of non-repentance, or detraction – as though to say, whether we like it or not, I am standing by the controversies.

Once again, Obama’s statement about small towns, all but hides his bitterness towards mainstream America, their religious values and their inalienable rights to
be against illegal immigrants and obscure trade policies. Obama portrays mainstream America as militant fanatics when he speaks of “clinging to guns”.

It is no wonder that your enrollment as a youth in the Wahabi school of radical Islamic teachings, followed by politically expedient change to the United Trinity Church lead by Reverend Wright, have had a serious influence in your political views when you dare condemn true religious values, unlike those taught by the militant Muslims. We have, Mr. Obama, many religious sects in the US – none of which I may add, rely on racism or divisiveness as their gospel. Regardless of the God, they rely in promoting racial equality and have never encouraged the use of arms for the purpose of destroying the United States as proclaimed by radical Islamist throughout the world.

This time around, I am sorry to say, Obamamaniacs, cannot allege their rhetorical defense of “guilt-by-association”. Too bad, as it was the candidate himself who blundered the comment about Americas’ small towns this time around. So...the guilt-by….is out. To now, Obamians, you have been able to get away with it. It was bound to happen though, he just can’t help himself. You know what they say: “you can lie to some of the people, some of the time, but not all of the people all the time.”

Your political / religious masquerade is starting to wear off. No sooner we wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt when you first started your race for the Presidency as our potentially first black American President, no sooner we were able to transcend the racial barriers, no sooner you’ve managed to shatter our hopes for these landmarks. It is truly a shame that, our hopes have now been turned into a great disappointment in you and what you stand for.

I blame not you for what you are. I blame your parents for abandoning you and letting you grow up as a confused young man, who’s caretakers made the decision to bring you up as a Wahabic follower – a faith that wages the Jihad wars against the western world. America’s small towns, Mr. Hussein Obama, do cling to religion and cling to bear arms not against their fellow-Americans but to defend and protect the Constitution of the United States of American and the nation for which it stands. It’s about time, Mr. Obama, that you define your pledge, sir!

Wednesday, April 9, 2008


Just in case you have not been able to keep up with some of the latest news on our beloved candidate for the Presidency, Barack Obama, and are wondering who is this sorry looking man in the mug shot to the left, and how is it related to candidate Obama. Well, first let me tell you a little about the repulsive human being in the picture and then I will tell you about him and Obama. The name of this monster is William [Bill] Ayers. Mr. Ayers first made headline news back in the 70’s, for his participation in a bombing of the New York Police Department. As member of the Weather Underground Group, a violent radical leftist organization, Mr. Ayers, admitted to participating also in the bombing of the Capitol Building in 1971, the Pentagon in 1972 and a building housing the State Department in 1975. After an intensive manhunt by the FBI, Mr. Ayers turns himself in and is later acquitted as charges are dropped for prosecutorial misconduct.

As a free man Mr. Ayers, writes his memoirs in a book entitled “Fugitive Days”. He chooses September 11, 2001 as the preferred date for publishing his book. In this same year [2001], in a New York Times interview aimed at promoting his book, Mr. Ayers talks about his involvement in the bombings and says: “I don’t regret setting the bombs, I feel we did not do enough”. O.K., so… how is this relative to Senator Barack Obama?

Well, lets start by saying that our dear Senator has had a “friendly” relationship with Mr. Ayers, that dates back to beginnings of Obama’s political carrier. In an article from ABC’s, New York Sun, reporter Jonah Goldberg writes of Ayers’s political relationship with Obama and says “a rite of passage when launching Obama’s career”, as the later allegedly had accepted Ayers’ campaign contributions in his race for the US Senate. When asked about Obama’s dubious relationship with Mr. Ayers, one of Obama’s spokesman says: “yes…they are friendly”. But wait… that’s not all. Does the story end here? Oh no, It gets better, a lot better – ask about the whereabouts of Mr. Ayers, today, 2008.

Today, we find Mr. Ayer sitting at Board of Directors of an extreme leftist foundation called “Wood Funds”, and guess who sat in the same board from 1999 to 2001? That’s right. You guessed it: Barack Obama. Wouldn’t you know? As a co-board member, Ayers and Obama, jointly approved of a donation to guess who? There you go. Right again – Jeremiah Wright and the United Trinity Church. Hello. Can the pattern be any clearer here, or am I missing something? The most extreme left-wing Senator in Washington, attends an Anti-American congregation and calls this militant church’s leader his spiritual mentor as the mentor preaches Anti-White sermons, and renounces to disown him, marries a woman who’s law school’s thesis is aimed at proving that “racism” is alive and well in one of the most prestigious schools of our nation, and claims not being able to be proud of America until his husband’s enters the race for President. Denies, his white heritage and fabricates stories enhancing his black blood, through continued fairy tales about how he and his black part of the family have been “one of them [blacks]”. In doing so he manages to demean a white grandmother that raised him and tells stories that never happened – father meeting during the Selma, Alabama riots, even though these took place five years after his birth; about the Kennedy’s air-lift choosing his father to come to America, on an air-lift that never happened. On and on and on. Repulsive, I should say.

With his now obvious selective memory, Senator Obama, meantime, chooses to discriminately remain quiet about his endorsement in 2006 of Socialist Kenyan cousin Raila Odinga in his run for the Presidency of that country. From the Jeremiah Wright incident to the so called “friendliness”, with Ayers - an admitted terrorist, the left-wing media of the country along with all other liberals who want this man to be our President, I keep hearing that all these issues should not be issues using the “guilt by association” defense. I dare say to all them, that our case is not based on guilty by association. Our case, my friends, is “guilt by participation”. That’s it. That simple. Enough is enough. You know how it goes: when you walk like a duck, quack like a duck…etc., Yes…you are duck.
I guess just about the only thing left to prove our point is to let him become President. Let all you left-wing liberals, socialist, anti-Americans, anti-Whites, have a taste of your medicine. Let your wonder boy, give away your country, raise taxes, subsidize the inept, give Iraq back to Al Qaeda, let Islamic extremist and terrorists all over the world, look upon the US as a weakened and vulnerable nation, where attacks as 9/11 are easy targets, as the lives lost then were relatively insignificant compared to that of our soldiers abroad and the need to bring them back. Go ahead Obamians, you can now have a Black Muslim extremist and an apologetic racist wife, right in the White House. God forbid, if that happens, I don’t know about you, but I would seriously consider calling my travel agent and booking myself in the next flight to any radical Muslim extremist Middle East country, get myself a turban, grow a beard, buy me a Koran and re-program myself in such a way that I can perhaps learn to understand what drives you to even consider this monster to be our President. After all, you know what say: “if you can beat them…join them.

I suggest and urge you that you click and go to the hyperlink below and see for yourself what I am talking about. And… if you agree with what I’ve written here, pass it on to your friends.


Saturday, April 5, 2008

Honoring The Dream

Last Tuesday, April 4th, marked the 40th anniversary of the death of Civil Rights leader, Dr. Martin Luther King. On this day alike, back in 1968, an assassin’s bullet deprives Dr. King from marching on with his crusade to make this nation a better place for blacks – a nation where equality, as envisioned by the founding fathers, would cease to be an issue worthy of political struggles, social divisiveness and otherwise militant extremes that had plagued our country’s history, dating as far back as our Declaration of Independence.
In 1963, four years prior to his untimely death, Dr. King delivers his now historical speech at the capital’s Lincoln Memorial: I Have A Dream. In his speech he says:

"I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.'"

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

One would hope and expect that Dr. King’s dream would have survived him as other black Civil Right leaders, carrying his torch and legacy, would one day have a black man as President of the same nation that a few years back, had riots in Selma, Alabama, advocating the rights of blacks merely to sit on a bus next to a white person.

As the days of Dr. King’s dream approached us in the person of Barack Obama, we can only wonder if, indeed, what this man stands for is what Dr. King was really dreaming of in his speech. The torch that led us to Obama was picked-up by others, who, unlike Dr. King, continue to demonize our country. They call themselves “Reverends” and use Church pulpits to deliver political sermons filled with hate, anti-Semitism, anti-Americanism and yes…anti-Whites.

The torch was carried by the likes of the Jessie Jacksons, the Al Sharptons, the Jeremiah Wrights, and the Louis Farrakahns, of our country. For years now, white Americans, guilt- ridden by the injustices that preceded the Civil Rights movement, and driven by their repentance for racial sins committed in the past, have allowed these so-called Civil Right leaders carry on with their rhetorical campaigns against the white and the rich- as though, capitalism and being born white, were major evils of our society, thus providing their Machiavellic platforms. White America’s graciousness and political correctness has, more often than not, been confused with fear, and any time whites dare challenge these black racists, the “race-card” is immediately flagged at all poles in the nation.

In the forty years since Dr. King’s death, we have seen how blacks decided to create a nation within the nation by calling themselves African-Americans. Notwithstanding a right to honor your heritage, I cannot fully understand, why someone born in this country, regardless of sex, race and creed, shall elect to be call themselves anything but American –save for those born elsewhere and later came to this country.

As despicable as the use of the N….word is, as despicable I find the adopted label which deviously contends an all-American identity. It is no wonder that Reverend Jeremiah Wright, dams America. And no wonder that Barrack Obama, a loyal follower of Mr. Wright, writes in one his books: "Any distinction between good and bad whites held negligible meaning."
While honoring Dr. King’s death anniversary and his speech in the Lincoln Memorial, we wonder if he were alive today, indeed his dream was to have a black President that professes that “not all men are created equal”, or for one of Obama’s mentors, Louis Farrakhan to say: “he wished that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged."
We share in Dr. King’s dream that: “one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." Regretfully though, the one time that Dr. King’s dream comes to life, the “Chosen” one has shattered it. We honor and respect your dream Dr. King, but we honestly believe that Barack Obama does not share it. Maybe the time has come when we Americans expunge, using Farrakhan’s words, Obama and all those that don’t share it. Then, and only then can the dream come true and we join in claiming: “We All Have A Dream”.

Friday, April 4, 2008


On the left of this picture, my friends, is the disgusting image of a man disguised under the ecclesiastical habit of a catholic priest. His name is Michael Pfleger, shown in this picture along with his spiritual (political) ally, Reverend Louis Farrakahn. Pfleger, dares call himself “Father”, while preaching a gospel that’s probably precisely the opposite of everything and anything that the Catholic Church and all churches, regardless of their denomination, for that matter, stand for. As a matter of fact, his pulpit manners clone those of Wright and Farrakahn. (See video link below).

Mr. Pfleger, made headline news this week, in a political sermon from the pulpit of his St. Sabina Church in Chicago while claiming to support Reverends Wright and Farrakahn, condoning these two for their militant anti-semitism, anti-americanism, and racist gospels, damming all who were critical of the two Reverends.

Mr. Pfleger is a disgrace to the Catholic Church, to all Catholics, to all Americans, and to all churches of this nation. Problem is we don’t do anything about it. I am inviting all Catholics throughout to write, or fax to your Archdioceses and their leaders to protest against this man and what he stands for. Mr. Pfleger is undeserving of the church he represents. We urge all of our Archbishops around the nation to take action and excommunicate this man, disbar him from his false priesthood and let him move on to other political stages, where he can continue to preach his gospel of hate for his fellow-man. You may write or fax your comments as they will not open unsolicited emails, to the following addresses:

Archdiocese of Miami:
Archbishop John C. Favarola
9401 Biscayne Blvd.
Miami Shores, Florida 33138
Telf. (305)-757-6241
Fax: (305)-754-1797

Archdiocese of Chicago:
His Eminence Francis Cardinal Jorge Omi
P.O. Box 1979
Chicago, Illinois, 60690-1979

Papal Basilica of St. Peter-Vatican
General Information Fax: 39-06-698-85518

If you want to link to Fox News and watch video on Father Pfleger, highlight the sentence below, right click on your mouse and select “Open Hyperlink”. Once on the sight, right click on “Catholic Controversy”. Make sure you are on an empty stomach when you do it.

Breaking News Latest News Current News - FOXNews.com